Grounded DI LLC / Evidence

See the work
behind Grounded DI.

You don’t have to take the description on trust. Read the tests, open the source material, and see what the results establish—and what still needs review.

01 / Tests & results

What has
been tested?

These records show what went into a test, how it was run, and what came out. The dates and limitations stay with the results.

A recorded BriefWise test

Run it again.
Compare the result.

In this local test, BriefWise DI² repeated its checks on a saved, fictional legal matter. It reproduced the evaluation and approval result, with an exact match to the saved replay identity.

The test also rejected a deliberately altered copy. The panel shows the recorded checks; the source explains how the test was run and what it does—and doesn’t—establish.

Read the test record

9 September 2026 · Local kernel 0.2.0. The record uses a saved synthetic matter with live release disabled.

What this test doesn’t establish The same local rule implementation was used. The original source bytes and history of authorization remain unverified. This test does not establish legal correctness, identical model generation, private model reasoning replay, or independent legal evaluation. External independent verification remains unverified.

The public package includes a package-integrity/event-chain checker. It does not include the kernel implementation used for the recorded run.

BriefWise DI²
Recorded verification
MATTERsynthetic-matter-001
Recorded verification
VERIFIED
Replay identity
EXACT MATCH
Canonical bytes
IDENTICAL
Event chain
9 events · VERIFIED
Altered content
REJECTED
Replay identity · SHA-256aa66baca6feaa5dc17aff300ded2f10591cefcdb7b6044e106741921273f0daf
Unmodified public source filesVerification JSON Download certificate
GDI-RHR-T16-0015 September 2026

Did the repeat run match?

Application
Cross-domain rule execution
Record date
5 September 2026
Status
Source-reported local replay

Two fresh runs produced the same decision record. A separate local checking program repeated the calculations and caught deliberately altered calculations.

Read the test record on GitHub
40 / 40Fixture tests in each fresh run
2 / 2Separate verifier baseline checks
9 / 9Adversarial challenges detected

Reported local results for this workload—not general accuracy figures or an independent external evaluation.

Browse the complete replay registry on GitHub

How did it do on the selected tasks?

IFEval-based benchmark series

Application
Cross-domain instruction following
Record date
Per-run dates in source; total corrected 21 September 2026
Status
Source-reported local checks

The published series reports 83 / 83 prompt-level local passes and 188 / 188 local checks across 83 positions (80 distinct source keys and three repeats). Official-evaluator executions are recorded for 27 of the 83 positions; no independent external verification is reported.

The 188 local checks cover 149 official instruction entries: later records count individual keyword terms separately. These are bounded local results, not an official 188-instruction score or a claim of general performance.

Why the total changed from 187 to 188

Book 10, reconciled edition v1.1, page 24, identifies an arithmetic error: the 83 source rows already sum to 188. The repository corrected its README on 21 September 2026. No recorded response or per-row count changed, and the reconciliation is not a new evaluator run.

Inspect the correction
Read the benchmark series on GitHub

BriefWise legal benchmark audit

Application
Law / legal work product
Record date
10 August 2026 checkpoint
Status
Provisional local audit

The repository reports a cumulative checkpoint of 501 / 501 criteria locally audited, including the CGL toxic-tort coverage-opinion task.

Grounded DI local audit using Harvey LAB-derived tasks. No official Harvey evaluation or independent validation is claimed.

Read the legal audit on GitHub

02 / Source material

What can
I read?

The five technical PDFs previously hosted here have been withdrawn from the current Site release. The public exhibit collection remains linked to its repository.

The evidence and decision library

Application
Law, weather, mathematics, and governance
Record date
September 2026 collection
Status
Source collection / individual record statuses vary

The collection brings together nine books and 260 source pages on the history of the work, mathematics, weather, law, and governance. The catalog will help you find the right title and edition.

The number of pages doesn’t establish a result. Check each record’s date, limitations, and review status.

Public filing record

Find a patent application.

Search by field, application number, or title. Each entry has its own date and status. Filing an application does not mean a patent has been granted or that performance has been proven.

Open the register

03 / Examples by field

Find an example
from your field.

Not sure where to begin? Start with one of these questions, then follow the link to the relevant record.

Law

What supports a legal draft?

Start with the repeated test on a saved BriefWise matter, then read the provisional legal audit.

9 September / 10 August 2026 · Local replay / provisional audit

Synthetic replay and bounded audit; not legal advice or proof of real-world filing authorization.

Review the law records
Weather & public safety

What was known before the weather arrived?

Look in the September catalog for “Before Reality Resolved — DI Weather Station.”

September 2026 collection · Release Candidate 1

Not publication-approved. PDF pages 10–11 and 16 distinguish local observations from same-site verification. No forecast guarantee or independent operational validation is implied.

Find the weather record
Environmental

What needs review before a water advisory?

“CleanWaterWise Cascade” follows a hypothetical water-assessment routing example in Selected Exhibits — Foundations, PDF page 10.

Synthetic demonstration · Source-indexed exhibit

This is not a measured contamination event, a public-health outcome, or authorization to issue an advisory.

Find the exhibit in the catalog
Mathematics

What can another reviewer check?

Look in the catalog for “MathWise / Erdos — Mathematical Record” and its supporting material.

September 2026 collection · Source record

Inspect each item’s proof scope and review status. Inclusion is not independent acceptance of a mathematical claim.

Find the mathematical record
Engineering & governance

When should the work stop for review?

Try the Platform page’s Law, Weather, and Engineering examples, then follow its links to the public roadmap and exhibit collection.

Illustration; no execution date · Conceptual workflow

These are illustrations, not the recorded tests above. They run no live analysis and authorize no release.

Try the illustrated examples

Work with Grounded DI

Want to talk through a record?

Tell us which example caught your attention and what you’d need to see for your own work.

Discuss licensing